Here is the comprehensive side-by-side comparison of Notabene vs. RemiDe followed by strategic actions to maximize defensibility and competitive edge.


📑 Full Comparison: Notabene vs. RemiDe

Updated: July 2025

For use in investor/partner discussions or standalone Notion page


🔹 1. Overview

Category Notabene RemiDe
Core Function FATF Travel Rule relay (SaaS for VASPs) Wallet-to-wallet remittance routing layer with built-in compliance
Positioning Compliance middleware Embedded payment + compliance infrastructure
Business Model B2B SaaS (license + API calls) Transaction-fee-based network (0.9% → 0.4%)
Target Users Compliance teams at exchanges, custodians Web3 wallets (30k–1m MAU) in EM corridors
Form Factor Dashboard + API + network of VASPs API + SDK; no UI layer for wallets’ end users

🔹 2. Compliance Handling

Feature Notabene RemiDe
Travel Rule Protocol Sends full IVMS-101 packet to counterparty VASP via mTLS & JWE Sends full IVMS-101 via /travelRule/notify; ACK required within 1s or tx fails
KYC / IVMS-101 Data Sees full unencrypted PII Stores full PII (DoB, ID#, name, etc.); attestation hash stored 5y
PII Storage Location Centralized (hosted by Notabene, unclear data regions) Frankfurt (AWS eu-central-1); structured for GDPR/BR/RU compliance
Legal Role Technical service provider (no liability) Joint controller with wallet under GDPR/MiCA
Sanctions Checks Optional; integrates Chainalysis Self-attestation model + optional sanctions API (TRM / Elliptic)

🔹 3. Funds Flow & Custody

Element Notabene RemiDe
Money Movement Does not handle funds; messaging only Executes transfer (same- or cross-chain), reconciles fees
Custody Not applicable Non-custodial by design: funds held by sending/receiving wallets
Settlement Path Outside scope Native stablecoin (USDT→USDC); cross-chain via Circle CCTP
Cross-Chain Flow Not supported Fully abstracted: Tron → Polygon → Base via native burn/mint

🔹 4. User & Wallet Experience

Aspect Notabene RemiDe
End-User Touchpoint None (pure backend) RemiTag alias + 4-digit code UX; sub-20s delivery for user
Partner Integration Time Weeks–months (due diligence, API setup) ≤5 business days onboarding (MSA + KYC vendor + $100 prefund)
Prefund Requirement None $100 refundable fee wallet balance; overdraft allowed (+50 bp)
Blocking Transfers N/A Never blocks user tx – applies fee markup on low balance

🔹 5. Technical Architecture

Layer Notabene RemiDe
Protocol Stack TRP (Travel Rule Protocol) + OpenVASP/IVMS schemas Go microservices + routing + fee ledger + IVMS-101 transport
On-Chain Anchoring None Daily Merkle root of KYC attestations on-chain (Polygon/IPFS)
Ledger Design Not applicable Redis + Postgres off-chain fee ledger; webhook-settled
API Footprint mTLS REST; VASP lookups + payload transmission /route, /travelRule/notify, /settle; chain-agnostic routing
Audit Trail Message logs Full JSON + partner ledger snapshot + CCTP attestation hash